| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:57:20 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ 024/171 ] sfc: lock TX queues when calling netif_device_detach() On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 16:54 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 21:42 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 16:25 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > 3.6.11.2 stable review patch. > > > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > From: Daniel Pieczko <dpieczko@...arflare.com> > > > > > > [ Upstream commit c2f3b8e3a44b6fe9e36704e30157ebe1a88c08b1 ] > > > > > > The assertion of netif_device_present() at the top of > > > efx_hard_start_xmit() may fail if we don't do this. > > > > You should also cherry-pick commit 35205b211c8d 'sfc: Disable soft > > interrupt handling during efx_device_detach_sync()' on top of this. > > > > Hmm, I had that in my quilt queue, but commented it out. I guess it > didn't apply well, and it was a bit too much to back port blindly. I'll > take another look. Strange, it's a trivial patch that applied fine. I wonder why I commented it out? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists