| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130412065710.GM1283@intel.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:57:11 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib-acpi: introduce acpi_get_gpio_by_index() helper On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:35:05AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote: > > > Grant and Linus W, > > > > Do you have any comments on this patch? Could it still be merged for 3.10? > > No and yes. > > Applied and pushed for linux-next now. Thanks! > Sorry for taking so long, I was confused by the discussion. np. We probably need to add another ACPI GPIO helper function to get all the GPIOs but I guess we can do that once a need emerges. For a single GPIO (like the patch here does) we know already from internal discussion that it will be needed. > I had to use some fuzzing to apply the patch, please check the > result in linux-next. Looks good to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists