[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1365757243.17140.28.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:00:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@...il.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: sw_perf_event_destroy() oops while fuzzing
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 08:34 +0300, Tommi Rantala wrote:
> [92759.011005] RIP [<ffffffff811a7200>] sw_perf_event_destroy+0x30/0x90
> [114607.070003] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811a7200>] [<ffffffff811a7200>]
> sw_perf_event_destroy+0x30/0x90
> [114607.070003] RIP [<ffffffff811a7200>] sw_perf_event_destroy+0x30/0x90
Would you have a source line for me that goes with that.. I can't seem
to poke any holes just by looking.
perf_swevent_init() only sets event->destroy() (to
sw_perf_event_destroy) _after_ it increments the static key thing and
enqueues (and allocates) the hash list stuff.
Obviously something is funny, but I'm not seeing it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists