| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <871uag812q.fsf@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:12:09 +0200
From: l.stelmach@...sung.com (Łukasz Stelmach)
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, r.krypa@...sung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@...sung.com>,
Piotr Bereza <p.bereza@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] security: smack: add hash table for smack for quick label
searching
It was <2013-04-11 czw 19:59>, when Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 4/11/2013 1:46 AM, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> I am a developer working on optimization of the TIZEN system.
>> Recently, I've discovered a performance issue in SMACK subsystem.
>> I used the PERF tool to find performance bottlenecks.
>>
>> The test scenario was simple. Run multiple applications and
>> see what the system does using the following command:
>>
>> perf record -a -g
>>
>> Next, see the results with the command:
>>
>> perf report -s symbol -g graph,0.5
>>
>> Among the many lines, the following ones are especially interesting:
>>
>> 5.96% [k] smk_find_entry
>> |
>> |--5.06%-- smk_access
>> | |
>> | --4.99%-- smk_curacc
>> | |
>> | |--3.79%-- smack_ptrace_access_check
[...]
>>
>> To sum up, the result indicates that the CPU spents circa 8% (2.16% + 5.96%)
>> of cycles searching for a SMACK label in the smk_find_entry function.
>> The function iterates through smack_known_list to find an entry.
>> The further analysis showed that the size of the list can reach even 600.
>> I measured that it takes circa 200 tries to find an entry on average.
>> The value was computed as a total number iterations in the smk_find_entry's
>> loop divided by the times smk_find_entry was called in a time-window of
>> the length of 10 seconds.
>>
>> IMO, this is a serious performance issue which scales badly with
>> a complexity of the system.
>>
>> I implemented a patch that makes a use of a hash table to quicken searching
>> for SMACK's labels. The patch is rebased onto the latest v3.9-rc6 kernel.
>> The code is thread-safe (I hope) because it shares the RCU mechanism
>> and locks with smack_known_list.
[...]
>>
>> I hope you find the measurement and the patch useful.
>> All comments are welcome.
>
> NAK
>
> There will be no hash tables in Smack.
>
> The correct solution is simple.
>
> In the task_smack structure there are two Smack label pointers,
> smk_task and smk_forked. Replace these fields with pointers to
> the smack_known structures that contain the Smack label pointers
> used today. This will require trivial changes throughout the
> Smack code to accommodate the type change and a few logical twists
> around smk_import. It will eliminate the need for smk_lookup_entry.
Allow me to join the conversation with an interesting observation.
I don't know whether hash table is a good solution to the problem Tomasz
has mentioned it definitely improves performance during loading rules.
Conditions:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
# number of subjects
sh-4.1# cat /etc/smack/accesses.d/* | cut -d\ -f1 | sort -u | wc -l
379
# number of rules
sh-4.1# cat /etc/smack/accesses.d/* | wc -l
23895
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Without the patch
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
sh-4.1# time smackctl apply
real 0m1.255s
user 0m0.115s
sys 0m0.895s
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
perfs output is:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
# ========
# captured on: Tue Jan 1 09:52:14 2013
# os release : 3.4.5
# arch : armv7l
# nrcpus online : 4
# nrcpus avail : 4
# cpudesc : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l)
# total memory : 1025456 kB
# cmdline : /perf record -a -g -- /usr/bin/smackctl apply
# event : name = cycles, type = 0, config = 0x0, config1 = 0x0, config2 = 0x0, excl_usr = 0, excl_kern = 0, id = { 45, 46, 47, 48 }
# ========
#
# Events: 1K cycles
#
# Overhead Symbol
# ........ ..................................
#
47.49% [k] strcmp
|
|--41.27%-- smk_find_entry
| |
| |--28.87%-- smk_import_entry
| | smk_import
| | smk_fill_rule
| | smk_parse_long_rule
| | smk_write_rules_list.clone.3
| | smk_write_load2
| | vfs_write
| | sys_write
| | ret_fast_syscall
| |
| --12.41%-- smk_write_rules_list.clone.3
| smk_write_load2
| vfs_write
| sys_write
| ret_fast_syscall
|
|--4.41%-- smk_import_entry
| smk_import
| smk_fill_rule
| smk_parse_long_rule
| smk_write_rules_list.clone.3
| smk_write_load2
| vfs_write
| sys_write
| ret_fast_syscall
|
--1.80%-- smk_write_rules_list.clone.3
smk_write_load2
vfs_write
sys_write
ret_fast_syscall
19.21% [k] smk_find_entry
|
|--12.44%-- smk_import_entry
| smk_import
| smk_fill_rule
| smk_parse_long_rule
| smk_write_rules_list.clone.3
| smk_write_load2
| vfs_write
| sys_write
| ret_fast_syscall
|
--6.78%-- smk_write_rules_list.clone.3
smk_write_load2
vfs_write
sys_write
ret_fast_syscall
[ less than 10% per entry ]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
With the patch
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
sh-4.1# time smackctl apply
real 0m0.349s
user 0m0.095s
sys 0m0.250s
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
still quite long but 3.59598853868 times better.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
# ========
# captured on: Tue Jan 1 10:40:45 2013
# os release : 3.4.5
# arch : armv7l
# nrcpus online : 4
# nrcpus avail : 4
# cpudesc : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l)
# total memory : 1025544 kB
# cmdline : /perf record -a -g -- smackctl apply
# event : name = cycles, type = 0, config = 0x0, config1 = 0x0, config2 = 0x0, excl_usr = 0, excl_kern = 0, id = { 1, 2, 3, 4 }
# ========
#
# Events: 606 cycles
#
# Overhead Symbol
# ........ .....................................
#
12.90% [k] smk_write_rules_list.isra.9
|
--- smk_write_load2
vfs_write
sys_write
ret_fast_syscall
7.86% [k] exynos_enter_idle
|
--- cpuidle_enter
cpuidle_enter_state
cpuidle_idle_call
cpu_idle
|
--7.69%-- secondary_start_kernel
0x4066df54
6.95% [k] v7_dma_inv_range
|
|--3.70%-- __dma_page_cpu_to_dev
| arm_dma_map_page
| arm_dma_map_sg
| dw_mci_pre_dma_transfer
| dw_mci_pre_req
| mmc_pre_req
| mmc_start_req
| mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq
| mmc_blk_issue_rq
| mmc_queue_thread
| kthread
| do_exit
|
--3.25%-- __dma_page_dev_to_cpu
arm_dma_unmap_page
arm_dma_unmap_sg
dw_mci_post_req
mmc_post_req
mmc_start_req
mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq
mmc_blk_issue_rq
mmc_queue_thread
kthread
do_exit
3.56% [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irq
|
|--1.40%-- mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq
| mmc_blk_issue_rq
| mmc_queue_thread
| kthread
| do_exit
|
--1.09%-- finish_task_switch
__schedule
|
--0.75%-- schedule
3.45% [.] 0x0000118c
2.94% [.] strncpy
2.67% [.] vfprintf
2.44% [k] strcmp
|
--- smk_find_entry
smk_import_entry
smk_import
smk_fill_rule
smk_parse_long_rule
smk_write_rules_list.isra.9
smk_write_load2
vfs_write
sys_write
ret_fast_syscall
[ less than 2.5% per entry ]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
--
Łukasz Stelmach
Software wizzard
Samsung Poland R&D Center
Al. Armii Ludowej 26, 00-609 Warszawa
http://www.rd.samsung.pl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists