[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1365810511-24811-12-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:48:31 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Shrink TINY_RCU by moving exit_rcu()
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Now that TINY_PREEMPT_RCU is no more, exit_rcu() is always an empty
function. But if TINY_RCU is going to have an empty function, it should
be in include/linux/rcutiny.h, where it does not bloat the kernel.
This commit therefore moves exit_rcu() out of kernel/rcupdate.c to
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h, and places a static inline empty function in
include/linux/rcutiny.h in order to shrink TINY_RCU a bit.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 --
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 4 ++++
include/linux/rcutree.h | 2 ++
kernel/rcupdate.c | 26 +-------------------------
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 1c53a9f..1d0145a 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -240,8 +240,6 @@ static inline void rcu_user_hooks_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS */
-extern void exit_rcu(void);
-
/**
* RCU_NONIDLE - Indicate idle-loop code that needs RCU readers
* @a: Code that RCU needs to pay attention to.
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 51230b6..e31005e 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@ static inline void rcu_cpu_stall_reset(void)
{
}
+static inline void exit_rcu(void)
+{
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
extern int rcu_scheduler_active __read_mostly;
extern void rcu_scheduler_starting(void);
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 3f1aa8f..226169d 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ extern void rcu_force_quiescent_state(void);
extern void rcu_bh_force_quiescent_state(void);
extern void rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state(void);
+extern void exit_rcu(void);
+
extern void rcu_scheduler_starting(void);
extern int rcu_scheduler_active __read_mostly;
diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index 48ab703..0be1fa2 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -104,31 +104,7 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock);
-/*
- * Check for a task exiting while in a preemptible-RCU read-side
- * critical section, clean up if so. No need to issue warnings,
- * as debug_check_no_locks_held() already does this if lockdep
- * is enabled.
- */
-void exit_rcu(void)
-{
- struct task_struct *t = current;
-
- if (likely(list_empty(¤t->rcu_node_entry)))
- return;
- t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 1;
- barrier();
- t->rcu_read_unlock_special = RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
- __rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
-
-void exit_rcu(void)
-{
-}
-
-#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
static struct lock_class_key rcu_lock_key;
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index e6cf7e5..086daaf 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -931,6 +931,24 @@ static void __init __rcu_init_preempt(void)
rcu_init_one(&rcu_preempt_state, &rcu_preempt_data);
}
+/*
+ * Check for a task exiting while in a preemptible-RCU read-side
+ * critical section, clean up if so. No need to issue warnings,
+ * as debug_check_no_locks_held() already does this if lockdep
+ * is enabled.
+ */
+void exit_rcu(void)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t = current;
+
+ if (likely(list_empty(¤t->rcu_node_entry)))
+ return;
+ t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 1;
+ barrier();
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special = RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
+ __rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
static struct rcu_state *rcu_state = &rcu_sched_state;
@@ -1099,6 +1117,14 @@ static void __init __rcu_init_preempt(void)
{
}
+/*
+ * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, tasks cannot possibly exit
+ * while in preemptible RCU read-side critical sections.
+ */
+void exit_rcu(void)
+{
+}
+
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists