[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130412053718.GC3887@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:37:18 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Bulk CPU Hotplug (Was Re: [PATCH] Do not force shutdown/reboot
to boot cpu.)
* Robin Holt <holt@....com> wrote:
> For the v3.9 release, can we consider my awful patch?
How about trying what I suggested, to make reboot affine to the boot CPU
explicitly, not by shutting down all the other CPUs, but by set_cpus_allowed() or
so?
That should solve the regression, without the ugly special-casing - while giving
time to address the hot-unplug performance bottleneck.
Once that is done disable_nonboot_cpus() can be used again for reboot.
(But no strong feelings either way - both solutions are a workaround in a sense.)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists