[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130413155457.GA6533@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:54:57 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] (Was: kernel: move exit_task_work() past exit_notify())
On 04/13, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > --- a/kernel/exit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> > @@ -795,7 +795,6 @@ void do_exit(long code)
> > exit_shm(tsk);
> > exit_files(tsk);
> > exit_fs(tsk);
> > - exit_task_work(tsk);
> > check_stack_usage();
> > exit_thread();
> >
> > @@ -822,6 +821,7 @@ void do_exit(long code)
> > ptrace_put_breakpoints(tsk);
> >
> > exit_notify(tsk, group_dead);
> > + exit_task_work(tsk);
>
> I am not comfortable with this change...
>
> The task is "really dead" after exit_notify(), even release_task(current)
> can be called.
>
> Let me think a bit... It seems that we have the alternative.
Andrey, Eric, how about this patch?
COMPLETELY UNTESTED and I need to recheck, but perhaps you can review?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists