[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130413160925.GA5236@debian>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:09:25 +0100
From: Joe Thornber <thornber@...hat.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>,
Amit Kale <akale@...c-inc.com>, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] bcache/dmcache/enhanceio bake-off
Hi Darrick,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and enhanceio.
I pushed some tweaks to the mq policy today to my thin-dev tree. They
show some improvements to these fio based tests.
In addition I've written a blog post trying to explain what's going on in dm-cache:
http://device-mapper.org/blog/2013/04/13/benchmarking-dm-cache-with-fio/
- Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists