[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130415080720.GB1994@udknight>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:07:20 +0800
From: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: yinghai@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] x86:aperture_64: code pattern clean
This patch don't change code function,
it just do prepare for import the
memblock_alloc_in_range to do the code pattern
which looks like below in one function:
memblock_find_in_range()
follow by
memblock_reserve()
Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c
index d5fd66f..1523e75 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@ static u32 __init allocate_aperture(void)
* memory. Unfortunately we cannot move it up because that would
* make the IOMMU useless.
*/
- addr = memblock_find_in_range(GART_MIN_ADDR, GART_MAX_ADDR,
+ addr = memblock_find_in_range(GART_MIN_ADDR, GART_MAX_ADDR - aper_size,
aper_size, aper_size);
- if (!addr || addr + aper_size > GART_MAX_ADDR) {
+ if (!addr) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"Cannot allocate aperture memory hole (%lx,%uK)\n",
addr, aper_size>>10);
--
1.7.12.4.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists