[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1366015165.4521.140661217861630.48211872@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:39:25 +0200
From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hans de Bruin <jmdebruin@...net.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, vm86: fix VM86 syscalls: use SYSCALL_DEFINEx(...)
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013, at 22:15, Hans de Bruin wrote:
> On 03/27/2013 10:18 PM, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013, at 20:46, Al Viro wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:31:02PM +0100, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> >>> Hi Al,
> >>>
> >>> Hans de Bruin found a regression due to one of your changes. I asked him to test a fix and he reported back that it worked. (Thanks!) Can you see if you agree with the fix? Patch is attached due to webmail...
> >>
> >> Use SYSCALL_DEFINE{1,2} for vm86_old and vm86, please.
> >
> > Like this?
Hi Al,
Could you comment on the patch for the problem with the VM86 calls? I changed it to use SYSCALL_DEFINEx at the definition sites, and I changed the declarations in asm/syscalls.h to fit. If things are ok, can you take care of sending it to Linus?
Greetings,
Alexander
> > Greetings,
> > Alexander
> >
>
> Is there any progress?
>
> --
> Hans
Download attachment "0001-x86-vm86-fix-VM86-syscalls-use-SYSCALL_DEFINEx.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (3315 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists