[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFRkauDhqwcHtJU_uBf8wMmKr8DohHZnU6DNPBnzZhTp9-eBfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:50:45 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To: Bengt Jönsson <bengt.g.jonsson@...ricsson.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Yvan FILLION <yvan.fillion@...ricsson.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: ab8500: Fix get_mode for shared mode regulators
> My understanding is for shared mode regulators:
> It can be in LP mode only when *BOTH* are in LP mode.
> If only one of the regulator in HP mode, then *BOTH* should be in HP mode.
> Did I misunderstand something?
Let me put this issue this way:
Current code behavior:
get_mode() returns IDLE if only one lp_mode_req flag is true, but mode
register value is HP.
AB8540_LDO_ANAMIC1 AB8540_LDO_ANAMIC2 mode register
get_mode() returns
lp_mode_req=true lp_mode_req=true HP
REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL
lp_mode_req=true lp_mode_req=false HP
REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE
lp_mode_req=false lp_mode_req=true HP
REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE
lp_mode_req=false lp_mode_req=false LP
REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE
with this path:
mode register value is consistent with get_mode().
AB8540_LDO_ANAMIC1 AB8540_LDO_ANAMIC2 mode register
get_mode() returns
lp_mode_req=true lp_mode_req=true HP
REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL
lp_mode_req=true lp_mode_req=false HP
REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL
lp_mode_req=false lp_mode_req=true HP
REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL
lp_mode_req=false lp_mode_req=false LP
REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists