[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130415110601.GE6512@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:06:01 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Actually write the runtime
configuration to registers
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> 2013/4/9 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>:
> > Someone has spent a fair amount of effort writing a runtime configuration
> > changing algorithm for DMA clients. However, the config appears to never
> > actually make it to hardware. In order for the configuration to take hold
> > we need to issue a d40_config_write(), as this is the routine which writes
> > it into the hardware's registers.
>
> No, it's not. This function is only for initial configuration which
> should only be written when the channel is allocated. In fact, by
> calling it here in runtime_config, you are introducing a serious bug:
> other logical channels on the same physical channel will stop because of
> the SSLNK/SDLNK of the physical channel being zeroed.
>
> The runtime config already makes it the hardware in the existing code,
> via d40_*_cfg().
Sorry Rabin, but the only place I can see the config being written is
in d40_config_write().
Can you paste the line of code in d40_*_cfg() which actually writes
the config to hardware please? I don't see it.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists