linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] msm core for 3.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <516BEF5A.7000101@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:15:22 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
CC:	arm@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] msm core for 3.10

On 04/14/2013 10:49 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:43:15PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
>> The following changes since commit f6161aa153581da4a3867a2d1a7caf4be19b6ec9:
>>
>>   Linux 3.9-rc2 (2013-03-10 16:54:19 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davidb/linux-msm.git tags/msm-core-3.10

>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/timer.txt          |  41 ++++----
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8660-surf.dts                 |  20 ++--
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8960-cdp.dts                  |  22 ++---
>>  arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c                          | 110 ++++++++++-----------
>>  4 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
> 
> I didn't see either of the device tree maintainers cc:d on the bindings
> update, nor an ack from them. It looks reasonable enough to me, but I
> also do know that in your private downstream tree you have a lot of new
> bindings. Please make sure these go through proper review channels as
> you start to upstream them; i.e. Grant Likely and Rob Herring should
> either merge or ack them.
> 
> I've cc:d Rob and Grant on this reply and I'll merge it for now but to avoid
> delays in getting your code merged in the future please make sure they are in
> the loop from the beginning.

Other than breaking the DTB-kernel ABI, looks fine to me. It's a
platform decision whether they are okay with that or not.

Rob


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/