linux-kernel - Re: Bulk CPU Hotplug (Was Re: [PATCH] Do not force shutdown/reboot to boot cpu.)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130415160408.GA3658@sgi.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:04:08 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Bulk CPU Hotplug (Was Re: [PATCH] Do not force shutdown/reboot
 to boot cpu.)

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 06:30:22PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/12, Robin Holt wrote:
> >
> > +void migrate_to_boot_cpu(void)
> > +{
> > +	/* The boot cpu is always logical cpu 0 */
> > +	int reboot_cpu_id = 0;
> > +
> > +	/* Make certain the cpu I'm about to reboot on is online */
> > +	if (!cpu_online(reboot_cpu_id))
> > +		reboot_cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
> > +
> > +	/* Make certain I only run on the appropriate processor */
> > +	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(reboot_cpu_id));
> 
> This is only theoretical, but perhaps it makes sense to set
> PF_THREAD_BOUND before set_cpus_allowed_ptr() ? To prevent the
> race with another thread doing sched_setaffinity().

I don't quite understand this comment.  We are migrating our own thread.
How does setting PF_THREAD_BOUND have any effect?

Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/