[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130415220406.GD12144@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:04:06 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, FPU: Fix FPU initialization
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 05:54:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:18:25PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > It was tip:master with x86/cpu merged in freshly.
>
> Ok, some more observations. I can trigger some oops similar yours (I
> haven't caught mine yet over serial or such) with latest tip/master +
> tip:x86/cpu.
Ok, here's the deal - it looks like a corruption which causes a couple
of different backtraces with different functions in the call trace. I've
bisected tip:x86/cpu and the evildoers are:
commit 3019653a57585602690fd38679326e9337f7ed7f
Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Date: Wed Apr 10 21:37:03 2013 +0200
x86/fpu: Fix FPU initialization
commit c70293d0e3fef6b989cd8268027d410cf06ce384
Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Date: Mon Apr 8 17:57:43 2013 +0200
x86: Get rid of ->hard_math and all the FPU asm fu
I'll venture a guess and say that if you revert those, your .config
would boot on your K8 too.
So, I'd propose we take those 2 out for more careful inspection and
fixing and the rest of tip:x86/cpu can go upstream in the upcoming merge
window. IMHO of course.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists