[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366097041.4583.13.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:24:01 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: lkml@...usoft.pl
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Very poor latency when using hard drive (raid1)
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 08:49 +0200, lkml@...usoft.pl wrote:
> On 15/04/13 11:59, lkml@...usoft.pl wrote:
> > There are 2 hard drives (normal, magnetic) in software raid 1
> > on 3.2.41 kernel.
> >
> > When I write into them e.g. using dd from /dev/zero to a local file
> > (ext4 on default settings), running 2 dd at once (writing two files) it
> > starves all other programs that try to use the disk.
> >
> > Running ls on any directory on same disk (same fs btw), takes over half
> > minute to execute, same for any other disk touching action.
> >
> > Did anyone seen such problem, where too look, what to test?
> >
> > What could solve it (other then ionice on applications that I expect to
> > use hard drive)?
>
> I got reply (by e-mail) suggesting to use XFS.
> Thanks, possible for other/next server.
>
> But I fell this should work correctly as well on ext4.
It should not starve readers that badly, something is wrong.
You can try setting low_latency for the devices if you're using CFQ
ioscheduler. For my box, that would be..
echo 1 > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/ata2/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda/queue/iosched/low_latency
Or, you can try a different scheduler. cat (blabla)/sda/queue/scheduler
to see which choices are available, and echo your choice back to the
file to select it.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists