[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1366107356-7699-6-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 06:15:55 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] tty: Clarify multiple-references comment in TIOCSETD ioctl
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 84ba790..9725c94 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -567,13 +567,15 @@ int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty, int ldisc)
tty_ldisc_restore(tty, old_ldisc);
}
- /* At this point we hold a reference to the new ldisc and a
- a reference to the old ldisc. If we ended up flipping back
- to the existing ldisc we have two references to it */
-
if (tty->ldisc->ops->num != old_ldisc->ops->num && tty->ops->set_ldisc)
tty->ops->set_ldisc(tty);
+ /* At this point we hold a reference to the new ldisc and a
+ reference to the old ldisc, or we hold two references to
+ the old ldisc (if it was restored as part of error cleanup
+ above). In either case, releasing a single reference from
+ the old ldisc is correct. */
+
tty_ldisc_put(old_ldisc);
/*
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists