linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86: kaslr: relocate base offset at boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <516CB8A8.2080007@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:34:16 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
	Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86: kaslr: relocate base offset at boot

On 04/15/2013 03:38 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> also do not overlap with boot_param, command_line, and initrd.
>>>
>>> and need to double check setup_header.init_size to make sure bss and
>>> etc will not
>>> fall into memory hole or reserved area in e820.
>>>
>>> also may need to setup page table for target position as bootloader may only
>>> has ident mapping only for loaded bzImage 64 areas.
>>>
>>> looks you are trying redo the work for bootloader to pick loaded phys addr.
>>
>> aslr.S's select_aslr_address uses z_extract_offset as the upper bound.

That seems really, really odd.

> so the decompressed image is not moved high?

This really seems wrong in so many ways.

If you relocate pre-decompression the amount of memory you need is given
by init_size:

#define ZO_INIT_SIZE    (ZO__end - ZO_startup_32 + ZO_z_extract_offset)
#define VO_INIT_SIZE    (VO__end - VO__text)
#if ZO_INIT_SIZE > VO_INIT_SIZE
#define INIT_SIZE ZO_INIT_SIZE
#else
#define INIT_SIZE VO_INIT_SIZE
#endif
init_size:              .long INIT_SIZE         # kernel initialization size

In real life, VO_INIT_SIZE dominates almost every time.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/