lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366081404.4459.127.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:03:24 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Vitaly V. Bursov" <vitalyb@...enet.dn.ua>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	John Eaglesham <linux@...2.net>
Subject: Re: Bonding driver has bad load balancing for forwarded traffic,
 3.7+

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 17:37 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 16:57 +0300, Vitaly V. Bursov wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have a bonding device (mode=802.3ad xmit_hash_policy=layer2+3 miimon=300) and
> > for kernels <3.7 forwarded IPv4 traffic distributed fine across multiple physical
> > links. Ethernet cards are Intel 82576 with igb driver (various versions).
> > 
> > 3.7 and 3.8 kernels tend to fully utilize only one link and leave the others almost idling.
> > 
> > Replacing bond_xmit_hash_policy_* functions with older ones (3.6 kernel) looks like
> > resolves the issue (but I haven't tested it thoroughly).
> > 
> > So, I added
> >          printk(KERN_INFO "hash_policy: protocol = %d, skb_network_header_len = %d, %d %d\n",
> >              skb->protocol, skb_network_header_len(skb),
> >              skb_headlen(skb), skb_network_offset(skb));
> > to bond_xmit_hash_policy_l23() of bond_main.c
> > 
> > and got this:
> > [   65.280831] hash_policy: protocol = 8, skb_network_header_len = 0, 74 14
> > [   65.280835] hash_policy: protocol = 8, skb_network_header_len = 0, 74 14
> > [   65.280839] hash_policy: protocol = 8, skb_network_header_len = 0, 74 14
> > [   65.280843] hash_policy: protocol = 8, skb_network_header_len = 0, 74 14
> > [   65.280847] hash_policy: protocol = 8, skb_network_header_len = 0, 74 14
> > [   65.280851] hash_policy: protocol = 8, skb_network_header_len = 0, 74 14
> > 
> > It's clear that the new check condition (skb_network_header_len(skb) >= sizeof(*iph))
> > fails here and hash policy fallbacks to l2 balancing.
> > 
> > I have no idea how to fix this besides removing this check completely, any
> > help would be appreciated.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for your report.
> 
> CC netdev
> 
> I guess that for forwarding setup, we don't set skb->transport_header
> 
> Please try following fix :

Here is a more complete patch, please test it.

Thanks !

[PATCH] bonding: fix l23 and l34 load balancing in forwarding path

Since commit 6b923cb7188d46 (bonding: support for IPv6 transmit hashing)
bonding doesn't properly hash traffic in forwarding setups.

Vitaly V. Bursov diagnosed that skb_network_header_len() returned 0 in
this case.

More generally, the transport header might not be in the skb head.

Use pskb_may_pull() & skb_header_pointer() to get it right, and use
proto_ports_offset() in bond_xmit_hash_policy_l34() to get support for
more protocols than TCP and UDP.

Reported-by: Vitaly V. Bursov <vitalyb@...enet.dn.ua>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Cc: John Eaglesham <linux@...2.net>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |   55 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 07401a3..d9ff09a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3286,20 +3286,22 @@ static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l2(struct sk_buff *skb, int count)
  */
 static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l23(struct sk_buff *skb, int count)
 {
-	struct ethhdr *data = (struct ethhdr *)skb->data;
-	struct iphdr *iph;
-	struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;
+	const struct ethhdr *data;
+	const struct iphdr *iph;
+	const struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;
 	u32 v6hash;
-	__be32 *s, *d;
+	const __be32 *s, *d;
 
 	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
-	    skb_network_header_len(skb) >= sizeof(*iph)) {
+	    pskb_network_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*iph))) {
 		iph = ip_hdr(skb);
+		data = (struct ethhdr *)skb->data;
 		return ((ntohl(iph->saddr ^ iph->daddr) & 0xffff) ^
 			(data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5])) % count;
 	} else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
-		   skb_network_header_len(skb) >= sizeof(*ipv6h)) {
+		   pskb_network_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*ipv6h))) {
 		ipv6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
+		data = (struct ethhdr *)skb->data;
 		s = &ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[0];
 		d = &ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[0];
 		v6hash = (s[1] ^ d[1]) ^ (s[2] ^ d[2]) ^ (s[3] ^ d[3]);
@@ -3318,33 +3320,36 @@ static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l23(struct sk_buff *skb, int count)
 static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l34(struct sk_buff *skb, int count)
 {
 	u32 layer4_xor = 0;
-	struct iphdr *iph;
-	struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;
-	__be32 *s, *d;
-	__be16 *layer4hdr;
+	const struct iphdr *iph;
+	const struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;
+	const __be32 *s, *d;
+	const __be16 *l4 = NULL;
+	__be16 _l4[2];
+	int noff = skb_network_offset(skb);
+	int poff;
 
 	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
-	    skb_network_header_len(skb) >= sizeof(*iph)) {
+	    pskb_may_pull(skb, noff + sizeof(*iph))) {
 		iph = ip_hdr(skb);
-		if (!ip_is_fragment(iph) &&
-		    (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP ||
-		     iph->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP) &&
-		    (skb_headlen(skb) - skb_network_offset(skb) >=
-		     iph->ihl * sizeof(u32) + sizeof(*layer4hdr) * 2)) {
-			layer4hdr = (__be16 *)((u32 *)iph + iph->ihl);
-			layer4_xor = ntohs(*layer4hdr ^ *(layer4hdr + 1));
+		poff = proto_ports_offset(iph->protocol);
+
+		if (!ip_is_fragment(iph) && poff >= 0) {
+			l4 = skb_header_pointer(skb, noff + (iph->ihl << 2) + poff,
+						sizeof(_l4), &_l4);						
+			if (l4)
+				layer4_xor = ntohs(l4[0] ^ l4[1]);
 		}
 		return (layer4_xor ^
 			((ntohl(iph->saddr ^ iph->daddr)) & 0xffff)) % count;
 	} else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
-		   skb_network_header_len(skb) >= sizeof(*ipv6h)) {
+		   pskb_may_pull(skb, noff + sizeof(*ipv6h))) {
 		ipv6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
-		if ((ipv6h->nexthdr == IPPROTO_TCP ||
-		     ipv6h->nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP) &&
-		    (skb_headlen(skb) - skb_network_offset(skb) >=
-		     sizeof(*ipv6h) + sizeof(*layer4hdr) * 2)) {
-			layer4hdr = (__be16 *)(ipv6h + 1);
-			layer4_xor = ntohs(*layer4hdr ^ *(layer4hdr + 1));
+		poff = proto_ports_offset(ipv6h->nexthdr);
+		if (poff >= 0) {
+			l4 = skb_header_pointer(skb, noff + sizeof(*ipv6h) + poff,
+						sizeof(_l4), &_l4);
+			if (l4)
+				layer4_xor = ntohs(l4[0] ^ l4[1]);
 		}
 		s = &ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[0];
 		d = &ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[0];


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ