linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/28] proc: Split kcore bits from linux/procfs.h into linux/kcore.h [RFC]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:13:49 -0700
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/28] proc: Split kcore bits from linux/procfs.h into
 linux/kcore.h [RFC]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> I have no seen any issue in this change. but why? Is there any
>> motivation rather than cleanup?
>
> Stopping stuff mucking about with the internals of procfs incorrectly
> (sometimes because the internals of procfs have changed, but the drivers
> haven't).

OK, thank you for explanation.

Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/