[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <516E597B.9010100@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:12:43 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <balbi@...com>,
<holler@...oftware.de>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] USB: ehci-omap: Improve PHY error handling
On 04/16/2013 06:32 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>> As the USB PHY layer never returns NULL we don't need
>> to check for that condition.
>>
>> If we fail to get the PHY device it could be due
>> to missing USB PHY drivers. Give this hint to the user
>> in the error message.
>>
>> CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
>> index 5de3e43..2e34ddd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
>> @@ -175,13 +175,13 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev, "phys", i);
>> else
>> phy = devm_usb_get_phy_dev(dev, i);
>> - if (IS_ERR(phy) || !phy) {
>> + if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
>> /* Don't bail out if PHY is not absolutely necessary */
>> if (pdata->port_mode[i] != OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_PHY)
>> continue;
>>
>> - ret = IS_ERR(phy) ? PTR_ERR(phy) : -ENODEV;
>> - dev_err(dev, "Can't get PHY device for port %d: %d\n",
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(phy);
>> + dev_err(dev, "Can't get PHY device for port %d: %d. Is USB_PHY driver enabled?\n",
>> i, ret);
>> goto err_phy;
>> }
>
> Getting rid of the !phy test is good. But I'm doubtful about the
> change to the error message. Are you going to make a similar change to
> every platform driver? There doesn't seem to be any reason to do this
> for ehci-omap but not the others.
I'm not very sure about that. If using the PHY API while USB_PHY is disabled
is to be treated as a universal failure, then the print might as well come from
the dummy stub for xx_usb_get_phy_xx().
For this patch, I'll just undo the print message change and resend. That could be
done in a separate patch instead.
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists