linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 2/5] spi: s3c64xx: added support for polling mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKrE-KfEetVCE7Q2OyA7dBtFNv71ydX_bNXxMTJK4dSdstoi_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:52:23 +0530
From:	Girish KS <girishks2000@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, t.figa@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/5] spi: s3c64xx: added support for polling mode

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:58:47PM +0530, Girish KS wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> > I'm missing patch 1 of this series.
>
>> its already  merged to stable tree after your review
>
> The patch numbering should reflect what you're posting.  If you're only
> sending four patches they should be numbered 1-4, otherwise it looks
> like there's something missing.  The goal with the numbers is to help
> people get the patches in the right order, the name should be enough to
> associate with other versions of the same patch.

OK. I will submit a new series ignoring the already merged patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/