linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 097/102] efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <516E9205.3070200@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:13:57 +0800
From:	Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>
To:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
CC:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>,
	"kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com" <kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com>,
	Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
	Michael Schroeder <mls@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 097/102] efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName

On 04/17/2013 07:56 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:37:43PM +0800, Lingzhu Xiang wrote:
>> On 04/16/2013 06:33 PM, Luis Henriques wrote:
>>> 68d929862e29a8b52a7f2f2f86a0600423b093cd efi: be more paranoid about available space when creating variables
>>
>> This prevents a bricking issue for some Samsung devices but causes
>> regression on many other machines.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55471
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947142
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/1078
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/47150
>>
>> This patchset will fix it again:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/1081
>
> Thanks for the pointer.  I note that in that thread you yourself imply
> there are still issues after applying them?  Was that accurate, is there
> yet further patches needed?

I just find that issue. Didn't see that when writing the above.

Earlier I was testing on a different machine and the result was good. I 
guess the patch still needs some more testing.


Lingzhu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/