[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130417124056.GA7359@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:40:56 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
Maneesh Soni <maneesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ptrace/x86: dont delay perf_event_disable() till
second pass in ptrace_write_dr7()
On 04/17, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> 2013/4/16 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>:
> >
> > Well, I disagree.
> >
> > To clarify, I agree with WARN_ON_ONCE(), but afaics it has nothing to
> > do with "second_pass",
> >
> >> And these are indeed supposed
> >> to.
> >
> > Indeed, but this is because ptrace_modify_breakpoint() should not fail.
> >
> > So, what do you think if I change the main loop above
> >
> > rc = ptrace_modify_breakpoint(...)
> > - if (rc)
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rc))
> > break;
>
> It can fail in the first pass if dr7 is incorrect. For example passing
> a length
^^^^^^
Oops. Indeed, I forgot that ptrace_modify_breakpoint() has other arguments,
not only "disabled" ;)
Thanks for correcting me.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists