[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <516E9A11.1040404@console-pimps.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:48:17 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>
CC: "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Chainsaw efivars.c
On 04/17/2013 01:30 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
>> This patch series introduces the new efivar_entry API, and splits out the major
>> parts of efivars.c into new files. In particular, having the efivarfs code
>> under fs/ allows building an efivarfs.ko module, which means mount(8) can
>> automatically load it.
>>
>> The remaining EFI code is repositioned under drivers/firmware/efi/.
>
> These all look good to me, so feel free to add my Reviewed-by.
>
> Tested on top of 3.9-rc7, with everything built as modules. Everything
> works as intended: systemd correctly detects it is on an EFI system,
> so mounts efivarfs, which auto-loads the required modules.
>
> Thanks a lot!
Thanks for reviewing and testing! I've added your Reviewed-by and
Tested-by tags to all 5 patches (but not the one you authored). I found
a bug in PATCH 3, so I've sent out a v3 of the series.
Peter, I've pulled these 6 patches into the 'chainsaw' branch in the EFI
repo. I think the prudent thing to do (as you previously suggested) is
to merge that branch into tip as a separate topic branch, just in case
we need to drop it before the merge window opens.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists