[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130417131149.GA26125@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:11:49 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] X86: Add a check to catch Xen emulation of Hyper-V
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:01:02PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:52:42PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 17.04.13 at 15:20, KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> > > If I recall correctly, the issue here was that Xen was enabling Hyper-V
> > > emulation un-conditionally even for Linux guests.
> >
> > To make this a little more precise - Xen is doing so only when the
> > guest config tells it to.
> >
> > Jan
>
> So it's something explicitly requested for this guest? Then I don't
> understand why does not make sense to override it in guest.
Typo, should have been "why does *it* make sense to override it in
guest.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists