linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86,efi: Implement efi_no_storage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:56:45 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
CC:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, matt.fleming@...el.com,
	cbouatmailru@...il.com, ccross@...roid.com, keescook@...omium.org,
	tony.luck@...el.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matthew.garrett@...ula.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,efi: Implement efi_no_storage_paranoia parameter

Am 17.04.2013 16:55, schrieb Matt Fleming:
> On 17/04/13 08:32, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 17.04.2013 01:16, schrieb Jiri Kosina:
>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>> +static bool efi_no_storage_paranoia;
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efi_no_storage_paranoia);
>>>
>>> Is there any particular reason to export this symbol?
>>
>> I saw that the other parameters in that file are exported too
>> and other (efi) drivers may also be interested in that symbol.
>> So I thought it is a good idea to export it too.
>
> I've applied this patch but I did drop the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() line. If
> people want access to this symbol at some future date we can address
> that later.

Okay. I'm fine with this!

Thanks,
//richard

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/