[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <516EBF23.2090600@sr71.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:26:27 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
CC: zhang.yi20@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: bugfix for futex-key conflict when futex use hugepage
On 04/17/2013 07:18 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>> This also needs a comment in futex.h describing the usage of the offset
>>> field in union futex_key as well as above get_futex_key describing the
>>> key for shared mappings.
>>>
>> As far as I know , the max size of one hugepage is 1 GBytes for x86 cpu.
>> Can some other cpus support greater hugepage even more than 4 GBytes? If
>> so, we can change the type of 'offset' from int to long to avoid
>> truncating.
>
> I discussed this with Dave Hansen, on CC, and he thought we needed 9
> bits, so even on x86 32b we should be covered.
I think the problem is actually on 64-bit since you still only have
32-bits in an 'int' there.
I guess it's remotely possible that we could have some
mega-super-huge-gigantic pages show up in hardware some day, or that
somebody would come up with software-only one. I bet there's a lot more
code that will break in the kernel than this futex code, though.
The other option would be to start #defining some build-time constant
for what the largest possible huge page size is, then BUILD_BUG_ON() it.
Or you can just make it a long ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists