[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201304172328.01071.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:28:00 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Device driver memory 'mmap()' function helper cleanup
On Wednesday 17 April 2013, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Not the way things are now.
>
> vm_iomap_memory() actually allows non-page-aligned things to be
> mapped, with the assumption that the user will then know about the
> internal offsets.
>
> The reason for that is questionable, but that's how pretty much
> every single user I've seen has worked, throwing the low bits of the
> physical away (after adding them to the length of the area).
There is a separate check for the physical address that gets
mapped in hpet_mmap:
if (addr & (PAGE_SIZE - 1))
return -ENOSYS;
We cannot remove that without changing the semantics of this function,
but the check that I mentioned:
if (((vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) != PAGE_SIZE) || vma->vm_pgoff)
return -EINVAL;
is for the virtual address. All of vm_start, vm_end and vm_pgoff
are guaranteed to be page-aligned through previous checks or
shifts, and we have also checked that the size is non-zero.
Since we pass a hardcoded len=PAGE_SIZE into vm_iomap_memory, that will
return -EINVAL for any non-zero vma->vm_pgoff. Testing ((vma->vm_end -
vma->vm_start) != PAGE_SIZE) is redundant as well, because we know it
is a positive multiple of PAGE_SIZE because of the call chain leading
up to this function, and vm_iomap_memory() ensures that it can not
be more than len, which leaves PAGE_SIZE as the only possible value
not resulting in -EINVAL without the extra check.
> It may be that I should have done things differently: make the normal
> helper function verify page alignment, and warn if it's missing. Then,
> we could have a "vm_unaligned_iomap_memory()" that would just do the
> "extend to aligned pages" that people could convert any odd users for.
> That would probably be a good thing to do, but it would be separate
> "phase two" from the "let's start using the sane helper".
Makes sense, but I think this is independent of the observation I made
regarding the checks for the vma.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists