linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Separate Logical Global Interrupt Mask (GIM) unmasking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:45:23 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	arnd@...db.de, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>,
	Dan Williams <djbw@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Separate Logical Global
	Interrupt Mask (GIM) unmasking

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:11:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> +void d40_log_gim_unmask(u32 *src_cfg, u32 *dst_cfg) {
> +
> +	*src_cfg |= 1 << D40_SREG_CFG_LOG_GIM_POS;
> +	*dst_cfg |= 1 << D40_SREG_CFG_LOG_GIM_POS;

So, in patch 3, you started using the BIT() macro.  But here it's fine
not to because... ?

Use one notation or the other, don't mix them together.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/