[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130418104523.GN14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:45:23 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>,
Dan Williams <djbw@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Separate Logical Global
Interrupt Mask (GIM) unmasking
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:11:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> +void d40_log_gim_unmask(u32 *src_cfg, u32 *dst_cfg) {
> +
> + *src_cfg |= 1 << D40_SREG_CFG_LOG_GIM_POS;
> + *dst_cfg |= 1 << D40_SREG_CFG_LOG_GIM_POS;
So, in patch 3, you started using the BIT() macro. But here it's fine
not to because... ?
Use one notation or the other, don't mix them together.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists