linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 24/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Supply full Device Tree parsing support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130418114756.GE27903@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:56 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Supply full Device Tree
 parsing support

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Thursday 18 April 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
> > You're right, I am a little confused by them.
> > 
> > I call them 'device type' because that's what they're called already.
> > Grep for 'dma_dev_type'. This is the number which gets split into
> > event group and line, like this:
> > 
> >         event_group = D40_TYPE_TO_GROUP(dev_type);
> >         event_line = D40_TYPE_TO_EVENT(dev_type);
> > 
> > > and I would put that number first.
> > 
> > So you want me to switch that round so it looks like:
> > 
> >         dmas = <<phandle> <dev_type> <fixed_chan> <flags>;
> > 
> > Instead of what I have at the moment:
> > 
> >         dmas = <<phandle> <fixed_chan> <dev_type> <flags>;
> > 
> > Correct?
> 
> Yes, that's probably better and more in line with what the other
> drivers do. You could also put the fixed_chan last if that helps.

I'd rather keep the flags as the final cell if it's all the same to you?

> I would still like to get a confirmation that we actually still
> require the fixed channel assignment, since it's just used
> in one driver, and that might only be needed for some buggy
> hardware revision if we're lucky.

Unfortunately not:

`git grep "\.use_fixed_channel" <internal_kernel> | grep true | wc -l`
8

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/