[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130418130009.GH79013@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:00:09 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
wim@...ana.be, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
vgoyal@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add hook for kicking in kdump path
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:49:59PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > A common problem with kdump is that during the boot up of the
> > second kernel, the hardware watchdog times out and reboots the
> > machine before a vmcore can be captured.
> >
> > Instead of tellling customers to disable their hardware watchdog
> > timers, I hacked up a hook to put in the kdump path that provides
> > one last kick before jumping into the second kernel.
> >
> > The assumption is the watchdog timeout is at least 10-30 seconds
> > long, enough to get the second kernel to userspace to kick the watchdog
> > again, if needed.
>
> Why not double the watchdog timeout? and/or pet the watchdog a little
> more frequently.
I am not sure if the watchdog timeouts can be doubled. I think Guenter
was saying some have a max of a couple seconds?? Petting a little more
frequently might be an option. Guenter can that be done with a softdog
option?
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists