[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <516F6559.1020309@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:15:37 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: gleb@...hat.com, avi.kivity@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] KVM: MMU: introduce invalid rmap handlers
On 04/18/2013 07:38 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:32:45PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Invalid rmaps is the rmap of the invalid memslot which is being
>> deleted, especially, we can treat all rmaps are invalid when
>> kvm is being destroyed since all memslot will be deleted soon.
>> MMU should remove all sptes on these rmaps before the invalid
>> memslot fully deleted
>>
>> The reason why we separately handle invalid rmap is we want to
>> unmap invalid-rmap out of mmu-lock to achieve scale performance
>> on intensive memory and vcpu used guest
>
> Better try to make the code simpler, and introduce complexity only
> if necessary.
Marcelo,
This code is necessary to implement "unmap invalid rmap out of mmu-lock",
the reason why we need it is that ...
>
> The idea to zap the roots is very elegant and apparently effective. What
> are its problems?
I mentioned it in 00/15:
* Challenges
Some page invalidation is requested when memslot is moved or deleted
and kvm is being destroy who call zap_all_pages to delete all sp using
their rmap and lpage-info, after call zap_all_pages, the rmap and lpage-info
will be freed. So, we should implement a fast way to delete sp from the rmap
and lpage-info.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists