linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat based on reclaim progress

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130418150942.GF2018@cmpxchg.org>
Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:09:42 -0700
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@...sync.net>,
	dormando <dormando@...ia.net>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat
 based on reclaim progress

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:57:52PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> @@ -2763,7 +2769,21 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
>  			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
>  
> +			if (!populated_zone(zone))
> +				continue;
> +
>  			lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * If any zone is currently balanced then kswapd will
> +			 * not call compaction as it is expected that the
> +			 * necessary pages are already available.
> +			 */
> +			if (pgdat_needs_compaction &&
> +					zone_watermark_ok(zone, order,
> +						low_wmark_pages(zone),
> +						*classzone_idx, 0))
> +				pgdat_needs_compaction = false;
>  		}
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -2832,7 +2852,8 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  				 * already being scanned that high
>  				 * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
>  				 */
> -				if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, &sc, lru_pages))
> +				if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, &sc, lru_pages,
> +						       &nr_attempted))
>  					raise_priority = false;
>  			}

There is the odd chance that the watermark is met after reclaim, would
it make sense to defer the pgdat_needs_compaction check?  Not really a
big deal, though, so:

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/