[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1304181237480.17375@syhkavp.arg>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:40:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] arm: introduce psci_smp_ops
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > This should allow the Xen problem to be resolved, because Xen will
> > provide the PSCI operations, and it's correct in that case to override
> > the platform's SMP operations.
>
> Yes, increasing the priority of PSCI helps Xen a lot.
> In order to completely solve the issue for Xen though, another patch is
> needed (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136630106201968&w=2) because
> of the introduction of smp_init.
Please look at the latest smp_init patch version I sent to you. It
shouldn't conflict with Xen any longer. It now returns a bool result
depending on whether it did set up smp_ops or not.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists