linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load average

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADZ9YHgq1UyyJUaF6j9e7pgwmz4rZmu3YzJrWRXcWCgh7_f+qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:06:53 +0600
From:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load average

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> On 13-04-18 07:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 11:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Recent activity has had a focus on moving functionally related blocks of stuff
>>>> out of sched/core.c into stand-alone files.  The code relating to load average
>>>> calculations has grown significantly enough recently to warrant placing it in a
>>>> separate file.
>>>>
>>>> Here we do that, and in doing so, we shed ~20k of code from sched/core.c (~10%).
>>>>
>>>> A couple small static functions in the core sched.h header were also localized
>>>> to their singular user in sched/fair.c at the same time, with the goal to also
>>>> reduce the amount of "broadcast" content in that sched.h file.
>>>
>>> Nice!
>>>
>>> Peter, is this (and the naming of the new file) fine with you too?
>>
>> Yes and no.. that is I do like the change, but I don't like the
>> filename. We have _waaaay_ too many different things we call load_avg.
>>
>> That said, I'm having a somewhat hard time coming up with a coherent
>> alternative :/
>
> Several of the relocated functions start their name with "calc_load..."
> Does "calc_load.c" sound any better?
>
How about sched_load.c ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/