linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] iommu/amd: Add workaround for ERBT1312

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:06:13 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] iommu/amd: Add workaround for ERBT1312

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 01:56:42PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> On 4/18/2013 1:35 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:

> According to the "kernel/irq/handle.c:irq_wake_thread()", I thought
> that for the threaded IRQ, if the system getting a new interrupt
> from the device while the thread is running, it will just return and
> do nothing.

Yes, but the irq-thread function itself executes the handler function
repeatedly until the IRQTF_RUNTHREAD bit is cleared. And every new
interrupt will set this bit again. So when there is a new interrupt
while our handler function runs the handler will be called again by the
irq-thread.


	Joerg


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/