[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-cc189d2513d1f45cde87a9043fe3be28559c7490@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:00:57 -0700
From: tip-bot for Waiman Long <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, williams@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
riel@...hat.com, Waiman.Long@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, scott.norton@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
davidlohr.bueso@...com, davej@...hat.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dhowells@...hat.com, aswin@...com
Subject: [tip:core/locking] mutex:
Back out architecture specific check for negative mutex count
Commit-ID: cc189d2513d1f45cde87a9043fe3be28559c7490
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/cc189d2513d1f45cde87a9043fe3be28559c7490
Author: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:23:14 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:33:36 +0200
mutex: Back out architecture specific check for negative mutex count
Linus suggested that probably all the supported architectures can
allow a negative mutex count without incorrect behavior, so we can
then back out the architecture specific change and allow the
mutex count to go to any negative number. That should further
reduce contention for non-x86 architecture.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Chandramouleeswaran Aswin <aswin@...com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
Cc: Norton Scott J <scott.norton@...com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1366226594-5506-5-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mutex.h | 10 ----------
kernel/mutex.c | 9 ++-------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex.h
index bc2a0b0..7d3a482 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex.h
@@ -3,13 +3,3 @@
#else
# include <asm/mutex_64.h>
#endif
-
-#ifndef __ASM_MUTEX_H
-#define __ASM_MUTEX_H
-/*
- * For the x86 architecture, it allows any negative number (besides -1) in
- * the mutex count to indicate that some other threads are waiting on the
- * mutex.
- */
-#define __ARCH_ALLOW_ANY_NEGATIVE_MUTEX_COUNT 1
-#endif
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
index 1dbd421..ad53a66 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -38,15 +38,10 @@
#endif
/*
- * A mutex count of -1 indicates that waiters are sleeping waiting for the
- * mutex. Some architectures can allow any negative number, not just -1, for
- * this purpose.
+ * A negative mutex count indicates that waiters are sleeping waiting for the
+ * mutex.
*/
-#ifdef __ARCH_ALLOW_ANY_NEGATIVE_MUTEX_COUNT
#define MUTEX_SHOW_NO_WAITER(mutex) (atomic_read(&(mutex)->count) >= 0)
-#else
-#define MUTEX_SHOW_NO_WAITER(mutex) (atomic_read(&(mutex)->count) != -1)
-#endif
void
__mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists