lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAHg+HipCX2ma6brxj9Kgc3ew39b5e30grLwyun9CViif-5wZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:55:35 +0530
From:	Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@...aro.org>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Anup Patel <anup.patel@...aro.org>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] arm64: Early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices.

Hi Will,
On 19 April 2013 14:35, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:48:49AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>> Actually i thought adding a config register will be easier to add a
>> code than writing entire emulation as 8250 emulation will require to
>> deal with dealing with more registers and more code.
>
> kvmtool already has an 8250 emulation! All we need to do is hack together
> something which will allow us to instantiate those ioport devices in a more
> flexible manner (namely, inside the MMIO space for ARM). For earlyprintk, I
> suspect we can get away without an interrupt too, which should simplify
> things a bit to start with.
>
> Regardless of the outcome of this discussion, I think getting the 8250
> working on ARM is definitely something worth doing. If I get time, I'll take
> a look.

I am not against using 8250 emulation (as far as it solves printk
issues for kernel booting logs), but my point is why not to add early
read-write support for virtio console, which also can be useful in
emulation less mach-virt environment also ?

Thanks,
Pranav

>
> Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ