lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:13:43 +0800 From: zhang.yi20@....com.cn To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] futex: bugfix for futex-key conflict when futex use hugepage Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com> wrote on 2013/04/18 22:34:29: > On 04/18/2013 01:05 AM, zhang.yi20@....com.cn wrote: > > > > I have run futextest/performance/futex_wait for testing, > > 5 times before make it long: > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 10215 Kiter/s > > > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 9862 Kiter/s > > > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 10081 Kiter/s > > > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 10060 Kiter/s > > > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 10081 Kiter/s > > > > > > And 5 times after make it long: > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 9940 Kiter/s > > > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 10204 Kiter/s > > > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 9901 Kiter/s > > > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 10152 Kiter/s > > > > futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second > > Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 > > Result: 10060 Kiter/s > > > > > > Seems OK, is it? > > > > Changes appear to be in the noise, no impact with this load > anyway. > How many CPUs on your test machine? I presume not 256? > > -- There are 16 CPUs, and mode is: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU C5528 @ 2.13GHz Shall I make the number of threads as the CPUS? I test again with argument '-n 16', the result is similar. BTW, have you seen the testcase in my other mail? It seems to be rejected by LKML.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists