linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma:of: Use a mutex to protect the of_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:25:44 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma:of: Use a mutex to protect the of_dma_list

On Friday 19 April 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Well, It's not only about the of_dma struct, e.g. the of_dma's of_dma_data
> field usually points to some driver allocated data. If we do not block in
> of_dma_controller_free() this data might be freed while the controller is
> still in use.

Right, makes sense. This could of course be worked around using a destructor
in the of_dma struct, but your approach is much simpler.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/