[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366388166.29403.2.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:16:06 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 1/4] arm: introduce psci_smp_ops
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 16:47 +0100, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> No one should be probing registers without making sure it is safe to do
> so. Even on non virtualized hardware this can be a dangerous thing to
> do.
Won't people writing per machine code consider, not unreasonably, that
having been called through a mdesc machine specific hook constitutes
enough "making sure" that they think it is safe to touch registers which
are specific to that machine?
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists