[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5171739C.90707@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:41:00 +0100
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Chao Xie <xiechao.mail@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate
Hi Mike,
On 03/04/13 22:34, Mike Turquette wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index 9fdfae7..1a19186 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ struct clk_ops {
> unsigned long parent_rate);
> long (*round_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long,
> unsigned long *);
> + s64 (*determine_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
> + struct clk *best_parent_clk);
Thanks for the comments. I've sent a new patchset based on this. I've
left the return value for determine_rate the same as round_rate though
(long rather than s64), figuring that introducing s64 would be a can of
worms, and if wanting to convert code to use s64, it should probably be
done together in a separate patchset.
Cheers
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists