linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] I2C: Change the value of octeon i2c adapter timeout value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130419183258.GB3702@the-dreams.de>
Date:	Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:32:58 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	EUNBONG SONG <eunb.song@...sung.com>
Cc:	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH]  I2C: Change the value of octeon i2c adapter timeout
 value

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:13:54AM +0000, EUNBONG SONG wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:01:04AM +0000, EUNBONG SONG wrote:
> >> 
> >>  I think HZ/50 is better than 2 for adapter timeout.
> 
> > Basically OK. But why HZ/50? Most drivers use HZ.
> 
> Actually, I just translated 2 jiffies because HZ is 100 in default cavium config. 
> You can find that in "arch/mips/configs/cavium_octeon_defconfig". 
> And i have been using this value over 1 year in octeon board without problem.

Have you been writing to EEPROMS? Their erase/write cycle might be
longer. But I am not forcing you to change the value, just giving some
suggestions.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/