[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130419212514.GC3075@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:25:14 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue.lkml@...us-software.ie>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
fenghua.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add check for P5 to microcode_intel_early
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:55:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Just filter out P5 and earlier. The code already does that for CPUs
> which don't have CPUID.
Actually, an alternative - more practical albeit not very accurate
solution would be to check for which families Intel delivers microcode
and do the cut off there with a comment as to why you do it like that.
I very much doubt, Intel will add microcode for *older* families to the
package :-).
IOW, in the linux intel-microcode package we currently have:
$ tree /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/
├── 06-0f-02
├── 06-0f-06
├── 06-0f-07
├── 06-0f-0a
├── 06-0f-0b
├── 06-0f-0d
├── 06-16-01
├── 06-17-06
├── 06-17-07
├── 06-17-0a
├── 06-1a-04
├── 06-1c-02
├── 06-1c-0a
├── 06-1d-01
├── 06-1e-04
├── 06-1e-05
├── 06-25-02
├── 06-25-05
├── 06-2a-07
├── 06-2d-06
├── 06-2d-07
├── 06-2f-02
├── 06-3a-09
├── 0f-04-01
├── 0f-04-03
├── 0f-04-04
├── 0f-04-07
├── 0f-04-08
├── 0f-04-09
├── 0f-04-0a
├── 0f-06-02
├── 0f-06-04
├── 0f-06-05
└── 0f-06-08
So < 6 should be fine.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists