linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] Driver for Si476x series of chips

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqFO7PBLchW6bQJ-t07dmhneyzpVY=MMAft0Se9cYZ2gTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:48:48 -0700
From:	Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
To:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
	Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] Driver for Si476x series of chips

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:58:26AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> Driver for Si476x series of chips
>>
>> This is a eight version of the patchset originaly posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/590
>>
>> Second version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/5/598
>>
>> Third version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/510
>>
>> Fourth version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/18/572
>>
>> Fifth version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/26/45
>>
>> Sixth version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/26/257
>>
>> Seventh version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/27/22
>>
>> Eighth version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/891
>>
>> To save everyone's time I'll repost the original description of it:
>>
>> This patchset contains a driver for a Silicon Laboratories 476x series
>> of radio tuners. The driver itself is implemented as an MFD devices
>> comprised of three parts:
>>  1. Core device that provides all the other devices with basic
>> functionality and locking scheme.
>>  2. Radio device that translates between V4L2 subsystem requests into
>> Core device commands.
>>  3. Codec device that does similar to the earlier described task, but
>> for ALSA SoC subsystem.
>>
>> v9 of this driver has following changes:
>>    - MFD part of the driver no longer depends on the header file added
>>      by the radio driver(media/si476x.h) which should potential
>>      restore the bisectability of the patches
> I applied all the MFD patches from this patchset (All 4 first ones), plus a
> follow up one for fixing the i2c related warning.
> I also squashed the REGMAP_I2C dependency into patch #4.
> It's all in mfd-next now, I'd appreciate if you could double check it's all
> fine.
>
> Mauro will take the rest, we made sure there won't be any merge conflict
> between our trees.
>

Thanks, I will try to test it today or tomorrow(20/04) at the latest.

> Cheers,
> Samuel.
>
> --
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/