[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUWhB=BTaQp0XuC8+PocQf3FzxBoytbzYFh=kup0LsapRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:55:55 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 18 [ call-trace: drm | x86 | smp | rcu
related? ]
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> See attached dmesg.
>
> This still has the bug Davidlohr pointed at:
>
>>> This looks like what Emmanuel was/is running into:
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/30/1
>
> you need to move the "IS_ERR()" check before the sem_lock.
>
Davidlohr pointed to this patch (tested the triplet):
ipc, sem: do not call sem_lock when bogus sma:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/31/12
Is that what you mean?
- Sedat -
> Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists