[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5171CF86.30708@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:13:10 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue.lkml@...us-software.ie>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add check for P5 to microcode_intel_early
On 04/19/2013 02:44 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 19/04/13 22:25, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:55:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> Just filter out P5 and earlier. The code already does that for CPUs
>>> which don't have CPUID.
>>
>> Actually, an alternative - more practical albeit not very accurate
>
> More practical ? Hmm - the MSRs don't exist for < P5
>
>> solution would be to check for which families Intel delivers microcode
>> and do the cut off there with a comment as to why you do it like
>> that.void
>
> You mean return !intel so this function will never be called.
>
> __init load_ucode_bsp(void)
> {
> int vendor = x86_vendor();
>
> if (vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
> load_ucode_intel_bsp();
> }
>
> Ah yes. That would work and be less code.
>
> We should do it that way.
Do you think you can have a patch for me in the next few hours?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists