[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5170DFD2.8000305@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:10:26 +0800
From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] Kernel panic on 3.9.0-rc7-4-gbb33db7
On 04/19/2013 03:10 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 18 2013, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:39:00AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yep, thanks Linus for that hint... Must be someone abusing it for a
>>>> flag field post submission? Crazy.
>>>
>>> Let's hope that's not the case because there'll be blood if it is. :)
>>
>> Yeah, it's beyond the amount of crazy I've come to expect from various
>> random users of IO interfaces :-)
>
> I think it's more likely to be some use-after-free after a long timeout.
>
> Wanlong says it happens a few minutes after boot, so maybe something
> times out a command, does the blk_complete_request(), and free's the
> bio, which gets re-used before the softirq actually ends up running.
>
> I note that Wanlong uses the SLAB allocator, not the SLUB one. I
> wonder if the thing goes away with SLUB, and if not, if
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y might help debug it?
Done as you mentioned, attach the config and dmesg before panic.
And the panic message almost the same as before here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/18/633
Thanks,
Wanlong Gao
>
> Linus
>
View attachment "slub_debug_on_config" of type "text/plain" (118451 bytes)
View attachment "slub_debug_on_message" of type "text/plain" (51711 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists