[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130419073731.GD20897@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:37:31 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] mutex: Improve mutex performance by doing less
atomic-ops & better spinning
* Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com> wrote:
> v3->v4
> - Merge patch 4 into patch 2
> - Move patch 5 forward to become patch 1
>
> v2->v3
> - Add patch 4 to remove new typedefs introduced in patch 2.
> - Add patch 5 to remove SCHED_FEAT_OWNER_SPIN and move the mutex
> spinning code to mutex.c.
>
> v1->v2
> - Remove the 2 mutex spinner patches and replaced it by another one
> to improve the mutex spinning process.
> - Remove changes made to kernel/mutex.h & localize changes in
> kernel/mutex.c.
> - Add an optional patch to remove architecture specific check in patch
> 1.
The patches look pretty nice now - thanks Waiman. I have applied them to
tip:core/locking and started testing them.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists